Proudly Conservative

Russell Brand takes on Sean Hannity

I continue my crusade against the imbecile known as Russel Brand. Just a few highlights.

Russell calls Hannity childish for his show logo, while in the process of calling him a ken doll, and making jokes and Hannity’s expense.

According to Russell, what we “perceive” as terrorism is simply the rational response to aggression from a big bad country such as Israel, or the United States.

"if they are in any way going to try and defend themselves, it is going to be "frew" what we would perceive as acts of terror, but that’s just language"

Regardless of how little Brand knows about the situation in Gaza, he does believe Sean Hannity is more like a terrorist than Hamas.

No wonder the CAIR rep on the show wouldn’t admit Hamas was a terrorist organization. CAIR is connected to terrorist organizations.

On the bright side, if we lower the bar for our military and police forces and our country gets to a point that armed rebellion is necessary it'll be that much easier to win.
Anonymous

I contemplated how to reply to this for a while. What a sad, morbid thought.

<3

The  malpractice and incompetence of the Obama/Holder Justice Department knows no bounds.The administration is seeking to lower the standards for law enforcement fitness because men and women are biologically different.  Heads up to all other businesses and organizations, if you don’t artificially high equal percentages across all gender,sexual orientation,race etc demographics, this DOJ may just sue you.

Hey, the police will be weaker and less fit but there will be more women on the force so, progress, right?

If they are showing up expecting everything for free I&#8217;d say they are assimilating quite nicely with this new generation of american voters.

If they are showing up expecting everything for free I’d say they are assimilating quite nicely with this new generation of american voters.

americas-liberty:

A jury awarded former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura $1.8 million Tuesday in his lawsuit against the estate of “American Sniper” author Chris Kyle.

On the sixth day of deliberations, the federal jury decided that the 2012 best-selling book defamed Ventura in its description of a bar fight in California in 2006. Kyle wrote that he decked a man whom he later identified as Ventura after the man allegedly said the Navy SEALs “deserve to lose a few.”

Ventura testified that Kyle fabricated the passage about punching him. Kyle said in testimony videotaped before his death last year that his story was accurate.

Legal experts had said Ventura had to clear a high legal bar to win, since as a public figure he had to prove “actual malice.” According to the jury instructions, Ventura had to prove with “clear and convincing evidence” that Kyle either knew or believed what he wrote was untrue, or that he harbored serious doubts about its truth. The jury sent the judge a note Monday saying they didn’t think they could reach a unanimous verdict. He told them to keep trying.

After finding in favor of Ventura, the jury was also tasked with awarding damages for any harm to his reputation, humiliation and embarrassment. Jurors had to find that Ventura suffered an economic loss as a direct result of Kyle’s statements, or that Kyle used Ventura to profit unjustly.

Neither Ventura nor Chris Kyle’s widow, Taya Kyle, were in the courtroom for the verdict. Chris Kyle was slain at a Texas gun range last year, so his widow is executor of his estate with control over proceeds from book royalties and movie rights.

In his closing argument, Ventura attorney David Bradley Olsen said he believes Kyle’s estate has earned more than $6 million from the book, and suggested that $5 million to $15 million would be reasonable compensation for what he said was irreparable harm to Ventura’s reputation.

“The verdict will tell the world Chris Kyle’s story was a lie,” Olsen said.

Olsen said Kyle’s claims that Ventura said he hated America, thought the U.S. military was killing innocent civilians in Iraq and that the SEALs “deserve to lose a few” had made him a pariah in the community that mattered most to him – the brotherhood of current and former SEALs.

“One-point-five million people have bought the book,” he said. “Millions more heard Fox TV trash Jesse Ventura because of it. And the story went viral on the Internet and will be there forever.”

Defense attorney John Borger had told jurors in his own closing argument that the 11 witnesses presented by the defense “tell a compelling and consistent story” that backed Kyle’s version.

U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle, who is not related to the author, told jurors they weren’t charged with determining whether Ventura was punched, but rather whether he was defamed by the remarks Kyle attributed to him.

Chris Kyle, regarded as the deadliest military sniper in U.S. history, included a brief account in his book of a confrontation at a bar in Coronado, California, with a man he called “Scruff Face.” In promotional interviews, Kyle identified the man as Ventura, a former SEAL who became a pro wrestler and movie actor before being elected for one term as Minnesota governor in 1998. Ventura was in Coronado for a SEAL reunion and graduation ceremony.

Olsen said inconsistencies in testimony from defense witnesses about what happened the night of Oct. 12, 2006, were so serious that their stories couldn’t be trusted. He also pointed out that people who were with Ventura that night testified that the alleged confrontation never happened. And he said Ventura would never have said any of the remarks attributed to him because he remains proud of his and his parents’ military service.

“The statement is completely out of character for Jesse Ventura. He never said anything like that in his life, and he never will,” he said.

Ventura testified that his income as a television personality fell sharply as job offers dried up in the wake of “American Sniper.” Borger said Ventura’s career as an entertainer was in decline well before that.

Does he believe suing a murdered american hero and winning a third of his book proceeds from his widowed wife will make him more popular?

Consider this, Ventura wanted almost 3 times the book proceeds. What a loser.

Scientists do not consider it a pregnancy before the implantation is completed. If the egg does not complete implantation due to thinned uterus lining, then there is no abortion of pregnancy as there has not been one. A fertilized egg cannot become a healthy fetus if it has not completed implantation. Your definition of life as a fertilized egg is not scientific, but a pro-life "opinion".
Anonymous

redbloodedamerica:

indigokyra:

oh-snap-pro-choice:

insignificant-bit-of-carbon:

oh-snap-pro-choice:

redbloodedamerica:

Actually, no, it begins at fertilization.  Everything in the pro-choice movement is based on lies, misinformation, technicalities, and excuses.

image

So an embryo gets more rights than a pregnant person. Alright. I see.
This is semantics
-Ash

redbloodedamerican spelt pro-life movement wrong

Rekt
-Ash

If life begins at fertilization, and all life is sacred…

Why is absolutely no one panicking about the 70-75% of fertilized eggs that end up miscarrying. (about 22% never implant at all) It’s a scourge that kills nearly 3/4 of all humans before birth! Where are the studies, the frantic research to save all of those precious babies? There are fights against abortion, but this kills so much more! We’ll fight against cancer, why not this?

Why is no one crying for research to be done to end this?

Oh, right, because when it comes down to it, the natural passing of a single-celled clump of potential humanness isn’t really a thing to be spending a whole lot of time, effort or resources on preventing, especially when we seem to be able to procreate just fine even with it existing.

image

Are you really trying to compare abortion to natural miscarriage and other birth/fertility complications?  That’s like justifying murder because cancer exists.

Are you also saying there aren’t fertility specialists who’s jobs are to work on solutions for women that do want to get pregnant but naturally have problems, so that one day they can hopefully get pregnant?

Were you thinking at all before trying to make this argument?

I mean come on, thousands of people die from car accidents and other unfortunate events every year, thats why murder should be legal. Since there is a chance the person won’t make it to a natural old age anyway! It would be an act of mercy really.

minawrotethis:

proudlyconservative:

lpninjaebru:

At least 160 children have died digging Hamas’s “terror tunnels” under Gaza.

poorrichardsnews:

image

The mainstream media likes to rant about Israel creating a “humanitarian crisis” in Gaza despite Israel’s extraordinary efforts avoid civilian deaths in its ongoing…

These kind of comments are baffling on so many levels. Supposedly the Palestinians are tunneling into Israel to get humanitarian aide from a country who these same people insist is treating them monstrously. Who are they getting aide from? Simpathetic Jews? The UN? The UN has no qualms about aiding palestine above the table so why would they be doing it on the sly from inside Israel? Arabs living within Israel? But then you would have to recognize that plenty of arabs are living quite happily in Israel.

Are they really suggesting that any rational country should be totally fine with clandestine tunnels being run into their country? Like that is a completely rational, understandable thing? No wonder we have a border disaster in this country with these kinds of people thinking what they believe to be logical thoughts.

Also, just because a group of people “elects” a terrorist group doesn’t mean that group ceases to be terrorists. Democrats elected KKK leaders (see:Robert Byrd) but they didn’t cease to be a members of a hate group. That just proves a moronic electorate (see:Barack Hussein Obama)

Darling what about another country invading and occupying land? Or another country bombing elementary schools, hospitals, UN buildings, bomb shelters and residential houses in the name of self defense even though no terrorist groups reside in those areas? Is that acceptable? Do you think America would stand still if Canada decided to randomly occupy American land, force people out their homes, target their food supply, attack their elementary schools and hospitals? Should Israel murder people brutally and expect no retailiation? Are you stupid or insanely racist to think any country wouldn’t react this way. Peace out

Sugar Pie, if Israel wanted the Gaza strip, they would have it before I finished typing this reply.  

Baby Doll, If Israel wanted to eliminate every school,hospital, and structure larger than a dog house, it could be done before you read this.

Honey Boo Boo Child, What Israel does want, is to stop being bombarded with missiles flung by a terrorist organization on a daily basis.

Sweet Heart, these tunnels were not built last week, Hamas has been building and attacking long before Israel launched its latest initiative to eliminate Hamas.

Pumpkin, Civilian buildings keep getting destroyed because Hamas hides behind civilians when conducting war. If Israel wanted to kill innocents than they are going about it horribly wrong by warning Gaza residents hours before attacks to evacuate.

Puddin’,  Gaza residents allows a Nazi terrorist organization Hamas to operate in their midst and rule. This organization has started a war they have no hope of winning, but what they do hope to do is to kill as many Israelis as possible and garner sympathy.  Who do you think Hamas is aiming for on the rare occasion they aim correctly? Military bases? I think not. 

Honeybun, Hamas is not reacting to Israeli aggression, they are the aggressors, and Israel has the facts on their side.  Why does Hamas break every humanitarian cease fire Israel agrees to? because peace is not the goal. The death of Jews is.

Dearest, as a self identified “immature 22 year old” I suggest you checkout the information redbloodedamerica has compiled on the subject, he has been able to put together much more substantive materials than I have to date.  I am neither stupid nor racist and I think I am mostly mature. I would recommend as you seek maturity to avoid making everything about race.

lpninjaebru:

At least 160 children have died digging Hamas’s “terror tunnels” under Gaza.

poorrichardsnews:

image

The mainstream media likes to rant about Israel creating a “humanitarian crisis” in Gaza despite Israel’s extraordinary efforts avoid civilian deaths in its ongoing…

These kind of comments are baffling on so many levels. Supposedly the Palestinians are tunneling into Israel to get humanitarian aide from a country who these same people insist is treating them monstrously. Who are they getting aide from? Simpathetic Jews? The UN? The UN has no qualms about aiding palestine above the table so why would they be doing it on the sly from inside Israel? Arabs living within Israel? But then you would have to recognize that plenty of arabs are living quite happily in Israel.

Are they really suggesting that any rational country should be totally fine with clandestine tunnels being run into their country? Like that is a completely rational, understandable thing? No wonder we have a border disaster in this country with these kinds of people thinking what they believe to be logical thoughts.

Also, just because a group of people “elects” a terrorist group doesn’t mean that group ceases to be terrorists. Democrats elected KKK leaders (see:Robert Byrd) but they didn’t cease to be a members of a hate group. That just proves a moronic electorate (see:Barack Hussein Obama)
Scientists do not consider it a pregnancy before the implantation is completed. If the egg does not complete implantation due to thinned uterus lining, then there is no abortion of pregnancy as there has not been one. A fertilized egg cannot become a healthy fetus if it has not completed implantation. Your definition of life as a fertilized egg is not scientific, but a pro-life "opinion".
Anonymous

redbloodedamerica:

Actually, no, it begins at fertilization.  Everything in the pro-choice movement is based on lies, misinformation, technicalities, and excuses.

image

If the process destroys a unique set of DNA which left unhindered would mature into a human child, that is abortion and destruction of human life. It is that simple.

You can argue about where the developing human is located or what stage of development it currently occupies but the scientific truth is that on a sub-cellular level, in every way that matters, that is a unique human being.